infrastructureaccessadvocacy

Broadband, Bridges and Visits: How Infrastructure Upgrades Could Improve Video Access to Prisons

UUnknown

2026-02-15

11 min read

Argues that highway and broadband investments should fund tele-visitation in rural areas to ease travel, expand family access, and advance digital equity.

Broadband, Bridges and Visits: How Highway and Broadband Projects Can Reduce Travel Burdens and Expand Tele-Visitation for Rural Families

Hook: For families who drive six hours each way, borrow money for gasoline, or skip work to sit in a parking lot outside a rural prison, the idea that a highway or broadband project could make visiting easier feels personal. In 2026, with states spending billions on roads and federal broadband funds in active deployment, there's a practical, little-used policy lever: require those investments to deliver tele-visitation and durable digital access for incarcerated people and their families.

Why this matters now (the inverted-pyramid answer)

Highway expansions and broadband grants are reshaping rural America in 2025–2026. State transportation agencies are approving multibillion-dollar road projects (for example, Georgia’s January 2026 plan to add toll lanes on I-75), and federal broadband programs continue to channel BEAD and other funds into last-mile builds. If policymakers and advocates act now, funds and right-of-way (ROW) decisions can be structured to build tele-visitation capacity where it matters most — rural counties with prisons and jails — saving families time and money, and expanding contact that research shows supports reentry and mental health.

Key thesis

Major infrastructure investments should include explicit provisions for tele-visitation infrastructure in rural areas: fiber conduit in highway ROWs, broadband middle-mile capacity to prisons and community hubs, public, no-fee tele-visit points at transit centers and rest areas, and requirements that telecommunications grantees prioritize digital equity for incarcerated populations and their communities.

The current landscape in 2026

In the past five years the U.S. infrastructure agenda has produced two parallel flows of capital: large transportation projects and targeted broadband grants. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and subsequent BEAD allocations set the stage for state-level broadband buildouts, while states simultaneously pursue big road projects to unclog freight corridors and commuter routes. These projects often cross the same rural counties that host prisons, detention centers and jails — yet planning rarely coordinates across agencies or considers tele-visitation as a community benefit.

That gap is consequential. Rural families already face higher travel burdens, limited public transit, and often poor digital options. When telecom outages happen — like major carrier disruptions reported in recent years —reliability concerns make families even more vulnerable. Integrating tele-visit infrastructure into highway and broadband projects addresses both physical and digital isolation.

How highway projects are a hidden opportunity for broadband and tele-visitation

Highway construction routinely involves:

Right-of-way acquisition and trenching that can host fiber conduit
Construction of communication hubs and power upgrades
Coordination with multiple municipal and county agencies

Those elements make highway projects a cost-effective time to deploy fiber and cellular backhaul. For example, when a project like Georgia’s I-75 express-lane expansion breaks ground, contractors will be trenching, relocating utilities, and building interchanges — all opportunities to install conduit for long-term broadband expansion without duplicating costs.

What to ask for in highway project contracts

Required conduit and spare fiber for public broadband use where projects cross rural counties with correctional facilities.
Coordination clauses that require state DOTs to consult with state broadband offices and corrections departments during design.
Provisions for fiber spurs to nearest county seat, jail, or reentry center.

Tele-visitation infrastructure: what it looks like and why it matters

Tele-visitation ranges from secure in-facility video booths for incarcerated persons to community-based, public-access kiosks where families can connect for free or very low cost. Important components include:

Low-latency, high-availability broadband: HD video needs 3–6 Mbps per stream for reliable two-way calls; hubs with multiple booths need scalable backhaul. See practical caching and delivery strategies for low-latency video.
Redundancy: Fiber plus cellular failover reduces outage risk — crucial in areas with frequent weather or network interruptions.
Secure, privacy-compliant platforms: Systems that protect personal data and comply with state corrections rules (see privacy templates).
Accessible locations: Public libraries, community centers, transit hubs, rest areas, or designated tele-visit centers near highways.
No-fee or low-fee models: To avoid the harm created by privatized, high-fee video visitation providers — watch for new consumer protections and reporting requirements (consumer-rights law updates).

Policy levers: how to make tele-visitation part of infrastructure funding

Below are practical policy approaches advocates can push for, with sample language ideas and funding pathways.

1. Require digital equity impact statements for highway and transit projects

Similar to environmental impact statements, a digital equity impact statement would assess how a project affects broadband access for vulnerable populations (incarcerated people, low-income families, rural communities). Sample requirement language:

"All state transportation projects with right-of-way work in counties containing correctional facilities must include a digital equity impact statement and identify opportunities for conduit/fiber placement to support tele-visitation and community broadband access."

2. Include tele-visitation as an eligible use in BEAD and state broadband plans

State broadband offices can explicitly list prisons, jails, and tele-visit community hubs as eligible public-interest anchor institutions. That allows BEAD subgrants or state matching funds to prioritize last-mile connections that facilitate tele-visits.

3. Use federal and state transportation funds to support middle-mile fiber

FHWA and state DOTs can allocate a portion of project budgets to build middle-mile networks alongside road projects. Because DOTs already manage long linear projects, adding conduit costs is marginal compared to standalone builds.

4. Mandate low- or no-fee visitation in contracts involving public funds

When public money builds tele-visitation infrastructure, contracts should require providers to offer no- or low-cost family access, eliminate predatory fees, and report usage and pricing metrics annually.

5. Promote community-hub models

Public libraries, municipal buildings, and rest areas can host tele-visit booths. Funding sources include community development block grants, ARPA leftover pots, state broadband grants, and philanthropic match funds. Community and pop-up models can be useful early pilots (community pop-up playbooks and neighborhood hub strategies).

Funding pathways to combine highway and broadband goals

Practical ways to pay for tele-visitation upgrades:

BEAD and state match funds: Use anchor-institution eligibility and supplement with state correctional funds (tie broadband grants to scalable hosting).
FHWA set-asides or project contingencies: Require conduit installation during highway builds.
State infrastructure banks and toll-revenue bonds: When issuing bonds for highways, designate a portion for broadband conduit and tele-visit hubs.
Public-private partnerships: Negotiate contracts that require private grantees to provide community benefits (free tele-visits) as a condition of access to ROW.
Philanthropy and reentry funds: Seed pilot programs at community centers that can be scaled with state funding.

Design recommendations: durable, family-centered tele-visit systems

Successful systems need to be reliable, user-friendly, and trauma-informed. Design recommendations:

Offer flexible hours and evening availability for working families.
Ensure ADA-compliant kiosks and interpretation services for multilingual families.
Provide on-site technical assistance at community hubs to help families connect.
Publish clear fee schedules and prohibit surprise charges.
Implement redundancy: fiber primary, LTE/5G as backup.
Collect anonymized usage data (with privacy protections) to measure impact and justify continued funding — tie reporting into a KPI dashboard.

Case examples and pilot concepts (2025–2026 relevance)

States that coordinated broadband and transport planning in recent years provide useful lessons. While major projects like Georgia’s I-75 expansion are focused on travel throughput and economic growth, they also create opportunities to coordinate with state broadband offices. Advocates in 2025–2026 successfully pushed for similar cross-agency provisions in smaller pilot projects, proving the concept at county scales:

Counties that integrated fiber conduit installation into bridge replacement projects reduced later broadband installation costs by 40% (pilot metrics, multiple county reports, 2024–2025).
Library-run tele-visit hubs that received BEAD-supported backhaul reported a 30–50% increase in family contacts in their first year, with strong qualitative reports of mental health benefits for incarcerated people and their relatives.

Those pilots show that modest, well-targeted requirements in major construction contracts can produce outsized social returns.

Risks and counterarguments — and how to address them

Opponents may argue that transportation money should not be mixed with social services, or that adding conduit increases project complexity and cost. Here’s how to respond:

Cost efficiency: Installing conduit during construction is far cheaper than trenching later. State DOT analyses usually show low marginal cost (often <5% of project cost) for conduit during builds.
Public safety and economic benefits: Improved communication reduces family stress and supports reentry, lowering recidivism-related costs over time.
Flexibility: Language can specify that conduit is reserved for public-interest broadband uses, not commercial encumbrances.

Technical checklist for planners (practical items to include in RFPs)

Designate spare conduit runs sized for future fiber strands (e.g., 4–6" conduit with pull boxes at regular intervals).
Locate pull boxes and junctions near county centers, jails, and library hubs.
Test for latency and packet loss targets (latency & delivery targets: latency <50 ms for tele-visits; packet loss <1%).
Require cellular antenna placement where terrain creates shadow zones.
Include language for service-level agreements (SLAs) guaranteeing uptime for tele-visit hubs.

Organizing and advocacy playbook — step-by-step

Families and community advocates can push this forward with a focused advocacy approach:

Map the need: Identify prisons and jails in your state and the rural highways that serve them. Document travel times and costs for sample families.
Identify projects: Track upcoming DOT projects and state broadband grant rounds (BEAD, state matching programs).
Engage officials: Request digital equity impact statements from DOTs and broadband offices. Provide model language for project contracts (use the sample clauses above).
Build partnerships: Work with libraries, reentry organizations, and municipal broadband advocates to propose pilot hubs. Community pop-up playbooks can help test models (community pop-up playbooks).
Push for low/no-fee requirements: Ensure that publicly funded infrastructure is tied to consumer protections and transparent pricing (see consumer-rights law developments).
Measure impact: Collect baseline data on visit frequency and travel costs; track changes post-implementation to make the case for scaling. Hook reporting into a KPI dashboard.

Measuring success: metrics policymakers should require

Include these metrics in contracts and grant conditions:

Number of tele-visits per month and change over baseline
Average travel miles and time saved by families
Percentage of visits conducted with no out-of-pocket tele-visit fees
Network uptime and average call quality
Post-release outcomes (where possible): employment, housing stability, recidivism — to the extent privacy rules allow measurement

Privacy, security and ethical considerations

Tele-visits must protect privacy and avoid creating surveillance risks. Key safeguards:

Limit data retention and prohibit data monetization of communications.
Adopt strict access controls and encryption for all video traffic.
Require transparency about any third-party vendors and their policies (vendor trust frameworks).
Offer alternatives for families without smartphones or technical literacy.

2026 trends and what to expect next

Late 2025 and early 2026 saw more visible debate about the social obligations tied to infrastructure spending. As states like Georgia push large transportation projects, advocacy groups are pressuring state agencies to prioritize multi-modal public benefits. Expect:

More coordination between state DOTs and broadband offices, driven by cost-savings and public demand.
Increased use of ROW clauses to support municipal and community broadband initiatives.
Stronger public scrutiny of privatized tele-visitation vendors and fee structures, leading to state-level regulations limiting rates or mandating free family access where public funds are used.
Growth of pilot programs that demonstrate measurable social returns and build political will for scale.

One concrete example: a rural pilot concept

Imagine a pilot along a proposed I-75 express lane corridor that includes:

Conduit laid during interchange reconstruction with fiber spurs to two county jails and three library hubs.
BEAD matching funds used for last-mile connections and equipment in libraries (no-cost tele-visit booths staffed evenings/weekends).
Contracts with providers to deliver free tele-visits to families and a public report on usage and fees.

That pilot would produce a clear cost–benefit case: families save travel expense and time, incarcerated people maintain family ties, and the county demonstrates improved outcomes that can attract further investment.

Actionable takeaways — what families and advocates can do this month

Identify upcoming highway projects in your county and file a public comment asking for conduit and tele-visit considerations.
Contact your state broadband office to request that prisons and jails be listed as anchor institutions in state BEAD plans.
Partner with local libraries to pilot a tele-visit hub and apply for small grants (state ARPA, community foundations).
Push for transparency: demand public reporting on tele-visit fees if your state already contracts with private providers.
Gather family stories and travel-cost data; stories influence policymakers more than abstract arguments.

Conclusion: Building connections when we build roads and networks

Infrastructure decisions are value judgments. When states decide to spend billions on highways and deploy billions more in broadband funding, they are shaping who gets access — to jobs, education, and family. Including explicit tele-visitation provisions in highway and broadband projects is a pragmatic, cost-effective way to reduce the crushing travel burdens rural families face and to expand humane, equitable contact options for incarcerated people. In 2026, the political and fiscal conditions are ripe. What’s needed now is clarity in project language, coalitions that span corrections, broadband and transportation advocates, and the conviction to demand that public investments serve public needs.

Call to action

If a loved one’s visit means a long drive or an unpaid day of work, this is urgent. Join our campaign at prisoner.pro to map highway projects near correctional facilities, sign model public comments for upcoming DOT hearings, and get templates to petition state broadband offices. Ask your county commissioner and state legislators to require tele-visitation infrastructure in transportation and broadband contracts today — because building roads and installing fiber should also build family connections.

Unknown

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.